1. I have to commend people like Robert Hudick and Kristina Collins for wanting to know everything that was going on with their diagnoses and treatment. Ideally, we would conduct such research before the treatments are administered, but we usually don't have the luxury of time to learn what oncologists are not telling us when it matters most. Perhaps, if we keep trying, we can finally break the mold. We have to learn to ask more questions and seek more answers.

Posted at 12:56PM on Sep 5th 2006 by Gregory D. Pawelski

2. I agree w/ Kristi you have to
read what is the best treatment
for you. Everyones addresses
their dx differently.
I believe you should not just take
what the drs says as GOLD.
Kristi's first Dr MISdx her
so 2nd & 3rd opinions are
sometimes needed.
Doctors are not infallible &
Kristi can attest to that .
SHE WAS NOT TO YOUNG FOR BC.
I will never ever take any
drs word again without getting
another opinion.

Patti Anastasi

Posted at 3:02PM on Sep 5th 2006 by Patti Anastasi

3. Prostate cancer is a disease where empowerment, that overused word, has an unusually big payoff, and Robert Hudick certainly became empowered! His approach and his success in changing his lifestyle are inspirational.

With over 4,200 studies published on prostate cancer each year, no doctor can keep up with all of it, and specialists usually have a strong preference for their own specialty when it comes to presenting options. They may mention all of them, but somehow their own specialties gets a strong extra push. Research has established that.

Also, prostate cancer therapy should be tailored to the patient -- not just therapy preferences and the usual diagnostic numbers, but also the patient's age and life expectancy, other health conditions, individual biology, and extra details about the cancer, if possible.

All of this puts an extra premium on empowerment for prostate cancer patients.

Congrats to Mr. Hudick!

Jim Waldenfels (Web site: http://www.mycancerplace.com/profile.php?id=147)

Posted at 6:22PM on Sep 5th 2006 by Jim Waldenfels

4. Cellular Medicine in Cancer

Cellular Medicine provides a new perspective in the developmental
steps of cancer and its metastasis and new safe, effective
therapeutic options.

Choices and Outcomes in Cancer Treatment:
For decades, standard treatment for cancer has consisted of
surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Radiation and chemotherapy,
the most frequently used therapies, not only are ineffective in
providing a cure, but also indiscriminately attack all cells -
healthy and cancerous, causing cellular damage and destruction of
the body's connective tissue, the defense against cancer
metastasis. Both radiation and chemotherapy trigger the development
of new cancers and damage the immune system and body organs. In
addition, these interventions activate enzymes that facilitate the
release of cancer cells from a localized area to spread to other
organs.

The Matthias Rath Research has achieved a breakthrough in
cancer research by defining the cellular mechanisms involved in
cancer proliferation and metastasis and developed a natural means
of controlling these mechanisms. Efficient control of the spread of
a disease by collagen-dissolving enzyme blocks has been successful
with several diseases. This is especially important in diseases for
which orthodox medicine has no preventive or healing therapies yet.
A combination of natural nutrients formulated to support the body
in curbing metastasis and reversing tumor growth, has been shown to
be effective against a variety of human cancer cell lines, without
adverse effects on normal cells.
The research is at this link:
http://www.drrathresearch.org/lab_research/cancer.html

These ingredients are used in Vibe

And make up the CollaMAX(TM) blend.

Vibe does not treat, diagnose or Cure any Disease, it just feeds the Body

What it needs to cure itself!






--
Epp
"When You Absolutely Positively Have to Feel Your Best"
http://www.switchtosuccess.com/snappy

Posted at 3:23PM on Sep 14th 2006 by Troy