Go back to school with your Mac, iPhone and TUAW

Note: The contents of this blog are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice or substitute for professional care. For medical emergencies, dial 911!

Different perspective on drop in breast cancer cases

There may be another explanation for the recently announced decline in breast cancer rates. And it's not nearly as promising as the first explanation may be.

A day after researchers announced that the significant drop in breast cancer cases is primarily due to fewer women using hormone replacement therapy (HRT), some experts suggest breast cancer rates are not dropping at all. Just as many women may have breast cancer, they say. They just aren't being screened for it.

"
We have been aware for several years that the number of radiologists who specialize in mammography have been decreasing, and that there are places in the United States where women have difficulty getting access to mammography," Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer for the American Cancer Society, wrote on the society's blog just after the public announcement.

"
If mammography use has reached a peak and is now decreasing, we may actually be diagnosing fewer cancers when they can be most effectively treated, Lichtenfeld said. "If you don't get a mammogram, you don't diagnose a cancer."

The research linking the decline in HRT to the drop in breast cancer came from the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston and was discussed at a breast cancer conference in San Antonio on Thursday. The research, based on a report by the National Cancer Institute, showed a seven percent drop in new breast cancer cases between July 2002 and August 2003, corresponding with the results of a 2002 Women's Health Initiative study.

With media reports citing HRT as the direct cause of the drop, some worry the public is getting the wrong message -- specifically women still taking hormones or those who have taken them in the past. While women not taking hormones are breathing a sigh of relief, others are in a panic.

Dr. Katherine Sherif, director of the Drexel Center for Women's Health at Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia, has spoken already with 15 patients worried about this news.

"What I have told them is that three years is too short of a time to measure the effects of a drug on breast cancer," she said.
"Cancers take decades to develop, and conversely, withdrawing hormones could not result in a decrease in breast cancer in three years -- it's actually absurdly short." There are also concerns women will experience anxiety about other therapies using estrogen, such as in vitro fertilization (IVF).

The study on HRT and breast cancer may be raising more questions than answers -- which could be a good thing. More questions prompt more investigation, more study, more research. And this will hopefully help us figure out one facet of the mystery of breast cancer.

Previous posts on the topic of HRT and breast cancer are as follows.
Cancer Fundraisers
 (0)
Cancer events (141)
Pink products (63)
Celebrities
Celebrity cancer diagnosis (73)
Celebrity fundraisers (83)
Celebrity in memoriam (75)
Celebrity news (173)
Celebrity spokesperson (46)
Features
Form and Function (7)
Today, I Am Grateful (10)
Worthy Wisdom (21)
RetroReview (6)
Saturday Six (4)
Sunday Seven (64)
Survivor Spotlight (40)
Cancer by the Numbers (17)
Recipe Healthy Living (52)
Healing Attitude Almanac (6)
Thought for the Day (148)
Media
Blogs (144)
Books (109)
Magazines (51)
Movies (21)
Products (154)
Services (116)
Sports (20)
Television (101)
Video games (4)
Meet the Bloggers
Bloggers (13)
Jacki Donaldson (2)
Kristina Collins (1)
Diane Rixon (1)
Nine DeJanvier (1)
Chris Sparling (1)
Allie Beatty (1)
Dalene Entenmann (1)
News
Daily news (684)
Events (85)
Fundraisers (169)
Opinion (170)
Politics (145)
Research (799)
Prevention
Cancer prevention foods (170)
Diets (213)
Environment (115)
Exercise (94)
Non-toxic alternatives (35)
Nutrition (131)
Obesity (52)
Smoking (101)
Stress Reduction (91)
Vitamins and nutrients (90)
Treatment
Alternative Therapies (411)
Cancer Caregivers (71)
Cancer Pre-vivors (21)
Cancer Survivors (469)
Chemotherapy (495)
Clinical Trials (160)
Drug (497)
Hospice (18)
Prevention (1327)
Radiation (77)
Stem Cell (25)
Surgery (40)
Types of Cancer
 (0)
All Cancers (820)
Anal cancer (2)
Animal (18)
Bladder Cancer (39)
Blood Cancer (18)
Bone Cancer (15)
Brain Cancer (106)
Breast Cancer (1324)
Cervical Cancer (72)
Childhood Cancers (204)
Colon and Rectal Cancer (235)
Endometrial Cancer (25)
Esophageal Cancer (35)
Eye Cancer (6)
Gallbladder Cancer (2)
Gastric cancer (5)
Germ Cell Tumors (1)
Head and Neck cancer (13)
Hodgkin's Lymphoma (55)
Kidney Cancer (56)
Leukemia (145)
Liver Cancer (50)
Lung Cancer (273)
Melanoma (105)
Mouth Cancer (42)
Multiple Myeloma (13)
Neuroblastoma (1)
Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (56)
Oral Cancer (16)
Ovarian Cancer (154)
Pancreatic Cancer (78)
Pet Cancers (11)
Pregnancy and cancer (6)
Prostate Cancer (233)
Rectal Cancer (3)
Sarcoma (8)
Skin Cancer (153)
Stomach Cancer (28)
Teen Cancers (26)
Testicular Cancer (17)
Throat Cancer (20)
Thymic Cancer (0)
Thyroid Cancer (49)
Tissue Cancers (1)
Tongue Cancer (3)
Unknown Primary (2)
Uterine Cancer (9)
Womb Cancer (1)
Young Adult Cancers (104)

RESOURCES

RSS NEWSFEEDS

Powered by Blogsmith

Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in: