There are a number of benefits to a vegetarian diet and here's another one: Lifelong vegetarians have a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer. The reason why is not made clear in the article but rather just that there's a link. So I wonder: What is it about a vegetarian diet that makes it healthier? Is it that vegetarians consumer more nutrients and antioxidants and less saturated fat? Does it have something to do with how non-meat food is digested? Is it because vegetarian diets are overall lower in calories and therefore less metabolizing means less harmful free agents in the body?I don't think this one study is a reason to quit eating meat, and although I'm not a big meat eater myself, I think that it can be part of a healthy diet if consumed in moderation and balanced out with lots of fruits, veggies and whole grains. What do you think? To eat meat or not to eat meat?











1. I think vegetarians don't have as much cancer because they're more conscientious about eating MORE fruits and vegetables. I was a fat vegetarian; ate lots of those. But I also ate lots of whole grains. Turned out I had celiac disease; the whole grains gave me a higher risk of GI cancers and non-Hodgkins via malabsorption of nutrients. It's not the meat, it's the gluten that was bad for ME. 3% are diagnosed with celiac, leaving 97% undiagnosed. Doctors might associate old beliefs of diarrhea and weight loss with celiac. I did not have diarrhea and was fat. How many of the country's 50-65% obese are walking timebombs with celiac, when 30-50% may have noted to have gluten "sensitivities?" I was chronically fatigued my whole life; worsened as I aged. Worsened as I ate the USDA's recommended 6-11 servings of whole grains/day. And doctors probably thought I was fatigued because I was fat. I was fat cause my body doesn't work right.
Posted at 11:48PM on Jun 3rd 2007 by a