Note: The contents of this blog are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice or substitute for professional care. For medical emergencies, dial 911!
Posts with tag Europe
Posted May 9th 2007 9:00AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: All Cancers, Daily news, Celebrity news
British Royal Prince William is following in his mother's footsteps as he takes on the role of president for the Royal Marsden Hospital, the first facility in the world dedicated to cancer treatment and research specific to the causes of cancer.
The largest comprehensive cancer center in Europe -- with partner The Institute of Cancer Research -- this hospital serves more than 40,000 patients from the UK and abroad annually.
"The Royal Marsden does an extraordinary job in treating thousands of cancer patients every year," said Prince William in a statement. "I am delighted and honoured to become president."
Posted May 4th 2007 10:00AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: Breast Cancer, Drug, Clinical Trials, Research, Daily news

Breast cancer drug Herceptin has been approved in Europe for use with hormonal therapy for postmenopausal patients with HER2 and hormone receptor positive metastatic disease.
Herceptin, made by Swiss drugmaker Roche Holding AG, is already approved in Europe for early and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.
This new approval is based on data from an international late stage clinical trial showing the combination of Herceptin with hormonal therapy doubled the median progression-free survival time.
Posted Apr 6th 2007 9:00AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: All Cancers, Clinical Trials, Products, Daily news, Thought for the Day

I never would have predicted it -- that a tooth could become a tool for dispensing medication. But the refinement of such a creation is actually in the works and before long, you may be asking not for a gold or decorative tooth but for one capable of doling out your drugs in the exact doses and at the right times.
Think about this:
Researchers from Europe and Israel are working right now on a tiny dispensing system called IntelliDrug. Their goal is to create parts small enough they can fit into a false tooth placed in the back of the mouth. The device will release a specific amount of medication at certain intervals so patients receive the proper dosage right on schedule.
This invention, crafted by an Israeli dentist, could pick up the slack for people who forget to take medicine and could save lives for those whose lives depend on scheduled drug therapy. It could also allow for better absorption of medication into the body.
The IntelliDrug device will deliver medicine directly into the bloodstream through the lining of the cheek around the mouth. Saliva, meanwhile, mixes with the drug and carries it throughout they body in a manner more efficient than just swallowing a pill every few hours.
While researchers hope to one day turn their device into a replacement tooth, the apparatus -- consisting of a stainless steel housing, a pump, custom valves, a microprocessor, batteries, and a reservoir for the drug pill -- currently comes in the form of a block the size of two teeth. It is strapped to the the side of teeth and hugs the inside of the cheek. The unit can be removed, and a technician can refill the drug reservoir, clean the unit, and change batteries when necessary.
Clinical trials on pigs are ongoing. Human testing is expected to begin by the end of the year.
Posted Mar 20th 2007 1:00PM by Kristina Collins
Filed under: Prevention, Research, Head and Neck cancer
According to an article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology, smoking is responsible for the majority of laryngeal cancer in Central Europe.
The majority of head and neck cancers are cancers of the larynx, or voice box. Central Europe has some of the highest incidence rates of laryngeal cancer in the world. Researchers are continuing to evaluate potential links between smoking and other environmental variables and the risk of laryngeal cancer.
Researchers from Europe recently conducted a clinical study to evaluate the potential role of both tobacco and alcohol in the development of this disease.
The study found:
- Approximately 87 percent of laryngeal cancer is attributed to the use of tobacco
- 75 percent of laryngeal cancer is attributed to current tobacco use
- 12 percent is due to past tobacco use
- Nearly 40 percent of laryngeal cancers are attributed to the interaction between alcohol and tobacco
- Stopping smoking for five years or longer protected individuals against the development of laryngeal cancer
- Alcohol use alone was not significantly associated with an increased risk of developing laryngeal cancer
The authors of the study states "Preventive efforts to encourage current smokers to quit are likely to be the most effective way to reduce the incidence of laryngeal cancer in this region"
Posted Feb 3rd 2007 9:00AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: Lung Cancer, Research, Smoking, Daily news

Secondhand smoke rears its ugly head once again -- this time in the form of study results revealing high levels of secondhand smoke in the workplace can double the risk of lung cancer for non-smokers.
Researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago looked at results from 22 studies conducted in the United States, Canada, Europe, India, Japan, and China. What they found -- and published in the
American Journal of Public Health -- is a lung cancer risk 50 percent higher than normal for non-smokers exposed to smoke on the job for more than 30 years. They also found risk increases with level of exposure.
"We believe that our study provides the strongest evidence to date that smoking in the workplace does present a substantial risk to workers -- and particularly to workers who are working in highly exposed areas such as bar workers or restaurant workers," lead researcher Leslie Stayner said.
Previous evidence for increased lung cancer risk caused by secondhand smoke comes from studies of non-smokers married to smokers.
Secondhand smoke -- also known as passive smoke and environmental tobacco smoke -- is smoke from a cigarette, pipe, or cigar as well as smoke exhaled from the lungs of smokers and inhaled by non-smokers. It can cause cancer, respiratory problems, and asthma in non-smokers and is leading to increased efforts by communities to ban or limit smoking in the workplace.
This week in France, bans begin in offices, stores, schools, and hospitals. Come January 2008, cafes and restaurants must also comply with bans. For now, smoking in these areas is permitted in hermetically sealed rooms without any services.
Posted Dec 21st 2006 9:18PM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Alternative Therapies, Drug, Opinion

According to a CBC News
report, ancient druids believed mistletoe had magical properties because of the way it grows, never touching the ground and without taking nourishment from the earth. However, University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff researchers are warning there is nothing magical about the use of
mistletoe extract for the treatment of cancer, and in fact, it can cause harm.
Serious side effects from the injection of mistletoe extract have been reported in the Christmas issue of the British Medical Journal, including a case concerning a 61-year-old woman who had a tumor-like growth develop under her skin, brought on when she self-injected herself with mistletoe extract. The researchers warn that the use of mistletoe extract has been shown to cause a severe allergic reaction, breathing difficulties, joint pain and kidney failure. Some studies have shown that mistletoe might actually lead to cancer growth.
Edzard Ernst, a professor of complementary medicine at the Universities of Exeter and Plymouth is quoted as saying, "The idea that mistletoe may help treat cancer is based on that the idea that mistletoe, like cancer, is a parasitic growth that eventually kills its host." The researchers of this published study indicated that there are over 30 mistletoe extract preparations available in Europe, and its use by cancer patients is well-known.
From another source, the National Cancer Institute's
overview of mistletoe includes the following:
- Mistletoe is a plant that grows on several types of trees and has been used since ancient times to treat many ailments.
- Mistletoe extract has been shown to kill cancer cells in the laboratory and to boost the immune system.
- Animal studies have suggested that mistletoe may be useful in decreasing the side effects of standard anticancer therapy.
- Many human studies using mistletoe to treat cancer have been done in Europe with unclear results, and a few clinical trials in the United States and abroad are in progress.
- Very few bad side effects have been reported from the use of mistletoe extract, though mistletoe plants and berries are poisonous to humans.
- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved mistletoe as a treatment for cancer or any other medical condition.
To read
detailed information about the highlighted overview, visit the NCI's FAQ about mistletoe.
Posted Dec 16th 2006 1:18PM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Breast Cancer, Prevention, Research, Environment, Daily news

A variation of a virus that infects common household mice might be responsible for one-third of the breast cancer cases occurring in the US, according to research presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium as reported by
WedMD.
The mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV), is spread like a cold virus from person to person, although the researchers are not certain if this virus is spread by sneezing or food contamination, or other means of transmission.
Mt. Sinai School of Medicine's Dr. James F. Holland is quoted as saying, "In Asia, the virus plays a very small role in causing the disease. The human breast cancer virus may explain why breast cancer rates differ throughout the world." The house mouse in question is not commonly found in Asia.
For so long, we have been told that the Asian diet pyramid, when compared to the Western diet pyramid, was one of the contributing factors in higher breast cancer cases for US women, and lower breast cancer cases for Asian women. It might well bea contributing factor still, as diet is firmly established as a cause for increasing the risks of all cancers. However, we cannot ignore that the researchers found the common house mouse virus present in the breast cancer tissue samples in 30-40 percent of the women from North America, Europe, and Australia.
That virus plays a role in the development of some cancers is a known, and it brings up interesting questions as to what leads to cancer, and potentially some explanations for the incidence of breast cancer for women who practice what is traditionally considered a healthy lifestyle and have none of the risk factors. Cancer is complex. As time goes on, I believe we are all going to sit back and be surprised at some of the causes for cancer as they are discovered.
Posted Dec 14th 2006 9:00AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: All Cancers, Magazines, Daily news

Don't rule out coloring your hair for fear it may cause cancer -- because there's not much evidence at this point that hair dye causes the disease.
Even though 22 potentially cancer-causing hair dyes were banned in Europe recently, it does not appear that any of them are actually used in products in Europe and the United States, according to a news update in the January 2007 issue of
Good Housekeeping.
And only one of these banned chemicals -- 2,3-Naphthalenediol -- is even listed in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's voluntary cosmetics registry.
So if you must make a New Year's resolution come January 1, consider making changes that clearly help lower the risk of cancer. Eat healthy, exercise, lose excess weight, limit or cease alcohol consumption, and quit smoking for starters. Coloring your hair? Not so bad -- yet.
Posted Nov 29th 2006 4:00PM by Kristina Collins
Filed under: Prostate Cancer, Research
A new urine test can tell the difference between an enlarged prostate or prostate cancer. This test from Gen-Probe is not approved in the United States but is approved in some European countries.
If a man has a noncancerous condition of the prostate a PSA (prostate-specific antigen) tumor marker test can rise. This rise in the PSA test can lead to a biopsy of the prostate. This biopsy is the only way to determine if the PSA test is picking up a cancer or an enlarged prostate that is not cancer.
The urine test is different because it detects genetic material--RNA--from prostate cancer gene 3 or PCA3. PCA3 is only found in the prostate and when the cells become cancerous the cells express more PCA3 RNA than normal cells. It is independent of the PSA test and works differently to detect cancer.
This test is not designed to replace the current PSA tumor marker but it can do something that the PSA cannot. It can be a separate tool used to determine if cancer does exist. Its not a perfect test but it can help out a few situations. If a man has a low PSA but wants some extra reassurance without getting a biopsy this test could be added along with the PSA. Also, it can help men that have a negative biopsy but a rising PSA decide whether they would like a second biopsy.
Urine tests are already used to detect bladder cancers and some kidney cancers so this test could provide the patient and the doctors with more information and better decision making tools.
Posted Oct 21st 2006 9:00AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: Breast Cancer, Drug, Chemotherapy, Daily news

The breast cancer drug Tykerb may be one of the future wonder drugs available for women left with limited options for treating advanced-stage disease.
Tykerb, manufactured by British-based GlaxoSmithKline PLC, is currently an experimental drug that delays growth of tumors nearly twice as long as standard chemotherapy in patients who no longer respond to Herceptin -- a targeted drug that significantly decreases chances of recurrence for women with HER2 positive breast cancer. Herceptin blocks the swift growth of an aggressive protein on the cell's surface while Tykerb does its work on the inside of the cell. Herceptin is given intravenously. Tykerb is given in pill form.
Two previous posts -- one in
April and one in
June -- relfect the progress of Tykerb as reported in the media. With each new report, Tykerb seems to gain momentum and promise. And this past week, new reports revealed new promise as Glaxo began seeking regulatory approval of the Tykerb pill in Europe.
Glaxo has filed an application with the Food and Drug Administration for approval of this drug and is preparing to market the drug for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in women. Glaxo hopes to launch Tykerb -- also known as lapatinib ditosylate -- next year.
Posted Aug 22nd 2006 8:00AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: Drug, Daily news

I feel fortunate to have received every cancer drug I needed to fight my breast cancer -- Adriamycin, Cytoxan, Herceptin, and every nausea pill, pain capsule, and anti-anxiety formula on the market. I got exactly what doctors thought I needed -- without worry about availability or funding or politics. I am lucky. Some in the UK are not so lucky.
Two targeted therapies for bowel cancer will not be used in Britain's state-run health system, according to NICE -- the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE, the country's financial watchdog, determined the high cost of the medicines meant their use was not compatible with the best use of resources. Patients are angry because these same two drugs -- Avastin and Erbitux -- are used widely in the United States and in much of Europe. And while neither drug offers a cure for bowel cancer, both treatments have been shown in clinical trials to extend life expectancy by four or five months in some patients.
Based on doses given during the trials, it is estimated that the average cost of treating one patient with Avastin would be around 16,800 pounds and with Erbitux -- about 11,700 pounds. Apparently, this is too much. But according to Hilary Whittaker of the charity Beating Bowel Cancer, the decision to deprive patients of this medication is a scandal. I agree. And for these patients, I am sad.
Posted Jul 23rd 2006 9:35PM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Skin Cancer, Prevention, Vitamins and nutrients, Television, Products

ABC News Good Morning America Kate Snow interviewed Los Angeles dermatologist Dr. Jessica Wu about a new herbal supplement being introduced on the American market this summer that is reported to protect the skin from sun damage that can lead to skin cancer.
Heliocare, a tropical fern extract used in Europe for decades to treat the skin conditions of psoriasis and eczema, comes in pill form and is taken daily.
Dr. Wu warns you cannot skip the sunscreen when spending time in the sun because the herbal supplement will not prevent sunburn.
"It gets into your blood stream and works from the inside out, as opposed to sunscreen which works from the outside in," explained Dr. Wu. "So this pill mops up the damage that gets past the sunscreen you might be wearing. It also repairs damage that is done to your skin that leads to skin cancer."
Heliocare is not recommended for pregnant women, nursing mothers, or children. Heliocare is expensive -- a bottle of 60 pills costs $60 dollars. I don't know why, but I was surprised when I watched this news story on ABC News. If something as simple as a fern extract can reverse sun damage to skin and reduce the risk of skin cancer -- and has been on the European market for decades -- why haven't we heard about it here in the US before now? I am not promoting this product -- I am just telling you what I saw on the news. ABC News.
You can watch the video of the news interview
here.
Posted Jun 1st 2006 11:33AM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Childhood Cancers, Leukemia, Drug, Chemotherapy, Prevention, Stem Cell, Politics, Daily news

The more I read the feature story,
The plight of the Russian cancer children, the more my heart broke. The more heavy my spirit became for the children and families around the globe who are facing what three-year-old Nastya Kuzmina and her parents have been facing in trying to figure out how to come up with the financial means to get Nastya the cancer treatments she needs in order to survive the leukemia she has been diagnosed with earlier this year.
Nastya came down with a cold that didn't go away and soon she was too weak to get out of bed. When the local doctor suspected cancer, he told the parents they would need to take little Nastya to Moscow to confirm the cancer diagnosis. While at Moscow's Russian Children's Clinical Hospital, Nastya's leukemia diagnosis was confirmed and the parents were told she would need treatment if she had any hopes of fighting the cancer and living. Cancer treatment is expensive. The parents are humble farmers of simple means. They sold all their furniture and livestock just to get to Moscow and -- with enough money left over to cover the cost of Nastya's first radiation treatment. They don't have money now to cover the expenses of living in Moscow and the special diet, medications and treatments that Nastya needs.
This is one ongoing story and struggle of the heartbreaking medical plight for the children and families in Russia. According to the newspaper reporter's account of the situation, ten years ago, 70 percent of children in Europe who had been diagnosed with leukemia were still alive five years later. In Russia, the figure was 10 percent. In Russia, a cancer diagnosis is often a death sentence. As the world remains in the dark, children are lost, and parents weep.
Photo credit: Will StewartIn a follow-up post: The beginning of light and hope to dry the tears might be on the way with the
Russian Midsummer Fantasy.
Posted May 31st 2006 10:44AM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Prostate Cancer, Drug, Prevention, Research, Cancer prevention foods

About ten years ago, Oregon State University researchers took an interest in hops. In particular, the flavonoid compound xanthohumol found in hops. Although xanthohumol was first discovered almost 100 years ago, no one was aware of the possible health benefits of the compound. In the last ten years, Fred Stevens, assistant professor of medicinal chemistry in OSU's College of Pharmacy, as well as a Linus Pauling Institute researcher -- with a team of researchers -- have been able to determine that hops might be effective in the prevention of cancer. In the latest published research paper, the researchers are stating that beer looks promising in
prostate cancer prevention and prevention of prostate enlargement. Before you get excited at the prospect that drinking beer is cancer prevention, according to the research, you would need to drink more than 17 beers to consume the same amount used in the study. Or you could travel to Germany.
There is a microbrewed beer manufactured and distributed in Germany that is xanthohumol-enhanced, and contains ten times the normal amount of the compound found in regular beer. The beer is not available outside of Germany. Researchers think that a drug containing a highly concentrated amount of xanthohumol might be an effective treatment for cancers in the future.
Posted Mar 28th 2006 1:22PM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Drug, Chemotherapy

University of Manchester and Christie
Hospital, UK researchers have completed a study that shows many
cancer
patients living in Europe are unaware of the latest in cancer treatments. Specifically, of those diagnosed with
cancer, and considering available cancer treatments, 90 percent had not heard of a breakthrough in treatment called
anti-angiogenesis. Anti-angiogenesis is the prevention of the growth of new blood vessels. Anti-angiogenic therapy is a
new therapy that works by stopping the blood supply needed for tumor growth.
"The world is entering a
new era in the treatment of cancer with the advent of innovative new cancer therapies and it's important that patients
and their medical advisors understand the potential of these new treatments to extend life," states Professor Nick
Thatcher, Professor of Oncology, University of Manchester and Christie Hospital. European researchers and physicians are
calling for increased patient education and greater patient access to new innovative cancer treatments options. I am not
familiar with any similar studies done in the United States or Canada indicating how many cancer patients are not aware
of the newest therapies available at the time of diagnosis, or when considering treatment, but my guess is the initial
percentage might be somewhat significant here as well.