Note: The contents of this blog are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice or substitute for professional care. For medical emergencies, dial 911!
Posts with tag New Zealand
Posted Jul 18th 2007 9:58PM by Martha Edwards
Filed under: Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Trials

Those of us following cancer news wait with baited breath for news of cures and treatments with promising results. So it's always a bit of a disappointment when it's bad news, like
this: New Zealand researches and determined that the clinical trails on an Ovarian Cancer Drug called DMXAA have not demonstrated any positive results.
The premise behind the drug was that it could kill cancer by reducing the blood supply to tumors, and it was given to Ovarian Cancer patients, along with Chemotherapy, to see if it would make a difference in recovery. Unfortunately, it didn't, and research on Ovarian cancer will be put on the backburner to make way for Lung Cancer trials at Novartis in New Zealand.
Posted Dec 28th 2006 10:00PM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: All Cancers, Politics, Smoking, Daily news, Radiation

New Zealand Christchurch Hospital radiation therapists are in a dispute over pay and have threatened to stage a strike beginning the first week of January. According to the hospital's clinical director of radiation oncologist Dr. Chris Wynne, the amount of money being argued over is so small that the other doctors have offered to pitch in and make up the difference to end the dispute and avert a strike that would affect 250 cancer patients.
Because Dr. Wynne has not received a response from the District Health Board or the radiologists regarding the monetary offer made by the doctors, he has decided to bring attention to the dispute by doing something even he admits is stupid -- he has started smoking. That's right. He is standing outside the hospital smoking cigarettes in a play for media attention. Obviously, it is working, as the story has been picked up around the globe.
But surely, was this the only way he could think to bring attention to the dispute? Who knows -- you and I might have chosen a different course of action -- but Dr. Wynne thinks it is the only thing left to do to bring attention to the innocent victims who will be affected by the strike -- the cancer patients who will have to go without timely treatment. Dr. Wynne says he will continue doing a stupid thing by smoking
for as long as it takes until the stupidity of the entire situation ends.
Posted May 21st 2006 3:22PM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Skin Cancer, Melanoma, Prevention

If you don't think staying out in the sun for long periods of time puts you at greater risk for skin cancer -- or that a wide-brimmed hat and sunscreen are all you need to be safe from the damaging rays of the sun -- you might be interested in what MoleMap, a melanoma surveillance program in Australia, discovered during a study of New Zealand
farmers and skin cancer rates. I was surprised -- and not in a good way -- by the results of the study.
According to the study, these farmers take sun safety very seriously and observe most of the advised sun safety practices of wearing wide-brimmed hats, sunglasses, protective clothing and sunscreen. Yet, with all those preventive measures, half of the New Zealand farmers, or close family members, have been diagnosed with skin cancer. The unavoidable truth is that the work they do requires them to be out in the sun for as long as eight hours a day.
MoleMap general manager Gavin Foulsham is quoted as saying, "We are getting absolutely hammered with ultraviolet rays from the hole in the ozone layer, and our skies are very clean, so we don't get the protective benefits of pollution either, which ironically caused the hole in the first place." The farmers are being asked to pay close attention to any changes to the skin that could indicate skin cancer and to get it checked right away. For all of us who are not required to work outdoors, this is a cautionary tale of why it is essential to take sun safety seriously and to stay out of the sun for long periods of time.
Posted May 21st 2006 12:36PM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Drug

Out of New Zealand comes reporting that four New Zealanders have
suffered rotting jawbones after taking a bisphosphates medication prescribed to help prevent bone loss for patients suffering from osteoporosis and bone cancers. At least 15 Americans are suing Merck after developing breakdown of bone in the jaw due to taking Fosamax prescribed to strengthen bone and prevent bone loss.
According to the report, while the New Zealand patients were not taking the brand name drug, Fosamax, they were taking a similar version of the same drug. In total, about 2500 cases of rotting jaws have been reported. Merck is the same company who was forced to take Vioxx, an arthritis drug, off the market after a study showed it doubled the risk of heart attacks or strokes if patients took it for longer than 18 months. Perhaps we need to take a closer look into the medicine cabinet -- and start asking more questions -- before we rush to get a glass of water and down the newest approved pill. A new cancer drug is about to hit the market. Let's take a look.
Continue reading Cancer drug linked to rotting jaws
Posted May 10th 2006 7:00AM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Lung Cancer, Mouth Cancer, Prevention

In the knowledge that a picture is indeed worth a thousand words, New Zealand's Ministry of Health wants the health
warning on cigarette packs to include large graphic photos of smokers with throat cancer or rotting teeth and gums.
According to the news report, Canada, Australia, Brazil and Thailand have already adopted graphic warnings and many other countries are also considering making the change. I live in the U.S. and I have never seen a pack of cigarettes with a graphic warning such as the one New Zealand is proposing, but I think that it might be more effective than mere wording. I went and searched images with
throat cancer and the graphic photos that came up were -- well -- let's just say the damage cigarette smoking can do is not very pretty. I wonder why the U.S. hasn't adopted this same sort of warning campaign?
Posted Jan 16th 2006 9:55AM by Jeri Kemple
Filed under: Skin Cancer, Prevention

Skin cancer kills approximately 300 people in New Zealand every year. This is mostly due to the
ozone layer being so thin in the southern hemishpere. A
study conducted by
government scientists and the University of Colorado. The cancer causing rays are 40 percent more severe in New Zealand
than places in North America which lie on similar latitudes. Apparently the lack of pollution is a large
contributing factor, this leaves me with a funny feeling. I don't really know who to wrap my head around it.