Note: The contents of this blog are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice or substitute for professional care. For medical emergencies, dial 911!
Posts with tag nation
Posted Mar 16th 2007 10:00AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: Colon and Rectal Cancer, Prevention, Cancer events, Research, Politics

On February 5, the President cut about $11 billion from the National Cancer Institute budget. On March 20, one group -- the
Colorectal Cancer Coalition or C3 -- will ask Congress to return some of this money.
Colorectal cancer advocates from all over the country will descend upon Washington DC on this day, in honor of
National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month. Their plan of action on behalf of C3's first-ever
Call-On Congress includes meeting with members of Congress face to face, discussing cancer research and prevention funding, and informing these powerful people that the time to cure cancer is now.
These advocates have a lot to accomplish -- and they need your help. So they ask that while they are rallying in DC that you lend your support with a few simple phone calls.
On Tuesday, March 20, between the hours of 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time, pick up your phone and call two Senators and one Representative. Tell them now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of the cancer cause.
C3 offers a
step-by-step guide for making yourself heard. The group will help you locate your specific legislators and provides a script for what to say and how to say it.
"The more people who call on March 20th and ask for Congress to make funding the war on cancer a priority, the better for us all," says one advocate.
Posted Jan 30th 2007 10:00AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: All Cancers, Events, Daily news

Radioactive cancer patients attending this weekend's Super Bowl in Miami could be in for an alarming experience when they pass through radiation detectors designed to signal the presence of
dirty bombs. Such cancer patients -- who have received treatment using radioisotopes and still may have tiny amounts of radioactive material in their bodies -- may want to come armed with letters from their doctors explaining their precarious set of circumstances.
The use of radioisotopes in medicine is growing -- and so is the use of radiation detectors in our security-conscious nation, which means patients are triggering alarms when they are not even aware they are being scanned, doctors and security officials say.
Nearly 60,000 people a day in the United States undergo treatment or tests that leave traces of radioactive material in their bodies, according to the Society of Nuclear Medicine. These traces are not enough to hurt anyone, but they are enough to trigger radiation alarms for up to three months.
Radioisotopes are commonly used to diagnose and treat certain cancers and thyroid disorders, to analyze heart function, and to scan bones and lungs. And many doctors already know to equip their patients with travel cards because of the problems they can encounter in public places.
Nearly 20 million nuclear medical procedures were performed in the United States in 2005 -- up 15 percent from 2001. Clearly, the number of people who could be mistaken for terrorists is quite large. So if you are one of these people -- with the power to create a buzz in a public setting -- get your papers in order so you can quickly confirm your identity as nothing more than a cancer patient.
Posted Dec 28th 2006 2:54PM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Breast Cancer, Events, Politics, Daily news, Celebrity in memoriam, Cancer Survivors

At the age of 93, former President Gerald R. Ford had become our longest living former president. As the nation mourns the passing of former President Ford, who died Tuesday at his home in Rancho Mirage, California, he is being remembered as a great healer of the nation in the aftermath of the Watergate scandal. At the time he pardoned former President Nixon, he was questioned and criticized for the wisdom of that action. In retrospect, his decision was credited for helping the nation move forward and heal.
Recovered alcoholic and breast cancer survivor Betty Ford is known for being a healer for the people of this nation in her own right. She willingly battled her most private demons and medical challenges openly, breaking the rules by speaking publicly about struggles society deemed private matters best kept quiet and spoken of only in whispers behind closed doors.
"It's hard for anyone born perhaps after 1980 or even in 1970 to understand that these things were not talked about," said Dr. Patricia Ganz, director of the division of cancer prevention and control research at UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center. "They were very stigmatizing. A woman didn't dare to mention to her friends, employer, extended family, that she had breast cancer."
Betty is credited with the successful launch of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation by attending the first luncheon. Nancy G. Brinker, founder of the foundation, has said of Betty Ford, "If she had not come, we would never have been able to launch. I don't think young women today realize the importance of what she did -- she lit the candle in dark rooms all over the world in healthcare and substance abuse and human understanding."
History will record that both former President Gerald R. Ford and former First lady Betty Ford were profound healers, in courage, compassion and wisdom.
Posted Nov 30th 2006 9:00AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: All Cancers, Daily news

The state of New Jersey outpaces the nation in survival of ovarian cancer -- but it lags behind when it comes to surviving endometrial, cervical, skin, mouth, and brain cancers.
New Jerseyans are still surviving cancer. But a report issued Tuesday reveals the state survival rate -- for some reason -- trails the national rate.
The difference between the state and national rates is not large -- about three percentage points separate the two -- but the racial disparity appears more significant. Survival rates for white men and women are about 10 percentage points higher than those for black men and women. This is similar to the national racial gap.
It's likely racial differences are due to later detection, later diagnosis, and less access to treatment and support services.
New Jersey survival rates also vary greatly by type of cancer, sex, and age.
Posted Jul 26th 2006 12:18PM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Politics, Nutrition, Cancer prevention foods, Television

Health ministers will be taking a look at current food industry advertising rules, and if they are strict enough to protect the health of its country's children. The Cancer Council NSW does not think so, based on a study they conducted regarding snack and fast food companies advertising aimed at children.
Based on the study, Cancer Council NSW's nutrition manager, Kathy Chapman, accuses the junk food and fast food segment of the food industry of ignoring regulations and a voluntary industry code on how targeted the advertising is for children, when giveaway toys and movie tie-ins with fast food meals and similar products were central to many ads to which children are exposed. According to the research, nearly a third of all television advertising aimed at children is for unhealthy or nutrient-deficient foods.
The television advertising aimed at children is called
pester power, and with the continuing rise in childhood obesity, the Cancer Council NSW wants food industry regulations enforced and the offenders penalized.
Posted Jul 24th 2006 8:30AM by Jacki Donaldson
Filed under: All Cancers

It does not surprise me that the
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center is among the best in the nation -- with internationally recognized physicians -- because I have always known this hospital to be the one stop where all medical difficulties and mysteries might be best managed -- in Ohio anyway. Growing up just an hour away from this facility, I thought maybe this was just the best Ohio hospital and that people headed here when other area hospitals could not deliver the best care. But now I know that the
Cleveland Clinic is a destination for people from many states and countries.
U.S. News & World Reports names the Cleveland Clinic
one of the nation's top three hospitals, the clinic's heart program is ranked number one, it boasts a highly successful Children's Hospital, and cancer patients travel from all over the world for leading-edge cancer care at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center. There is even a Cleveland Clinic location in Florida. This hospital -- that I once believed was nothing more than a local healing place -- has quite a reach. And quite a reputation.
Posted May 10th 2006 6:30AM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Prevention

For a health-informed public that is beginning to demand more nutrition and less fat in the food they are served -- fast food is falling out of its once favored position of popularity as a quick meal for kids. Who doesn't think that McDonald's and the golden arches are the unofficial defining symbol for fast food?
In response to the perception that fast food is not linked to good health, along with the negative image resulting from the book and movie Fast Food Nation -- and now the publication of a children's book Chew On This, which is co-written by Fast Food Nation author Eric Schlosser -- McDonald's has announced the creation of a
Global Moms Panel. Nine women from six countries will advise the company on balanced and active lifestyle initiatives, restaurant communications and children's well-being.
Translation? McDonald's wants to find out how to market to moms who are interested in their children living long healthy lives free from obesity and the nutrition-deficient food that can increase the risks for major disease later in life, like cancer. Which has the potential for being a good thing if McDonalds does offer healthier food as a result of the recommendations from moms. If it's just a public relations campaign to improve a business image then I believe the public will see through it and the effort will backfire. According to Mary Dillon, McDonald's global chief marketing officer, "We want to become the best ally we can for moms and a true partner in the well-being of families everywhere." Time will tell.
Posted Apr 29th 2006 7:00AM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Alternative Therapies, Ovarian Cancer, Colon and Rectal Cancer, Kidney Cancer, Prevention

According to the National Cancer Institute, the
lack of physical exercise is the primary cause leading to an increase in the percentage of overweight and obese adults
and children. Weight gain and obesity increases the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, uterine cancer, colon cancer,
kidney cancer, and esophagus cancer. This last week, Lance Armstrong was a guest speaker for CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta's
Fit Nation college tour addressing the
issue of obesity. There really isn't any breaking news or magic formula when it comes to fighting the battle
against obesity in this country. Moving more and eating less are the keys to success in reducing obesity and cancer
risks. But even Armstrong, a world class athlete and cancer survivor, admits there are some days when he is not
motivated to significant physical activity.
"For the last seven months I've sort of found myself in a
position to where there were a lot of days where I said, 'I don't want to do anything today.' For a guy who did
something for 20 years four or six hours a day, and then I got done and I said, 'No not today.' But now I'm in a
position where I find myself wanting to do it again," Armstrong said. "I like junk food. If I had my choice I
would eat a breakfast burrito for breakfast and a cheeseburger for lunch and Chuy's for dinner. But that's not the
choice I make everyday because that would mean I would be 230 pounds very quickly." I don't know why, but I feel
better about my semi-lack of self discipline now. The issues of maintaining healthy weight and physical movement are
becoming an intense focal point for cancer prevention, and I think we will begin to hear more about this topic from
well-known cancer survivors.
Posted Apr 25th 2006 7:23PM by Dalene Entenmann
Filed under: Breast Cancer, Prevention

Brigham and Women’s Hospital researchers have
determined that
eating
French fries during the early years of life is linked to a significant increase of developing breast cancer later in
life. Researchers believe this study, involving 2,000 nurses, further demonstrates the effect diet has during the early
formative years to health in later years. As part of the Nurses’ Health Study and the Nurses’ Health Study
II, mothers filled out a questionnaire in which they indicated which of 30 foods their daughter ate between the ages of
three to five years old.
According to the researchers, they found that each additional serving of French
fries per week represented a 27 percent increased risk of breast cancer. Potatoes were not the problem. The cooking
method of frying French fries in saturated fats and trans fats seemed to be what created the increased breast cancer
risk. One more bit of bad news from the fast food nation.