
If passed and signed into law, the Health Freedom
Protection Act, H.R. 4282, will provide cancer patients with the right to be told of potential health benefits regarding
vitamins, minerals, herbs and other supplements. As it stands now, it is against the law for a company to provide any
treatment claims or refer to any relevant scientific evidence proving the effectiveness of a nutrient, herb or
supplement that they manufacture or sell.
An excellent example of this restriction is made in the case of
curcumin. As stated in the March issue of
CancerWire, there
are over 500 scientific articles about curcumin and cancer. Curcumin, also known as turmeric, has been shown to be
effective in protecting against colon cancer. However, a curcumin manufacturer or distributor can run into serious
trouble with the law by sharing this information with a customer who is fighting colon cancer.
Cancer
Monthly
interviewed attorney Jonathan Emord who practices
food and drug law, deceptive advertising law, and libel law. Mr. Emord supports the Health Freedom Protection Act. I am
going to share one of the statements he made during the interview that might stun you, as it did me, "Right now FDA
censors EVERY nutrient-disease treatment claim. The FDA now prohibits companies from giving to consumers peer-reviewed
articles by independent scientists and institutions if they concern the role of a nutrient in treating a disease,
including the government's own scientific publications on the role of nutrients in treating disease."
Here is the stunning part of the interview. Emord goes on to say, "Dr. David Graham, the senior FDA drug safety
officer explains that on dozens of occasions, FDA allowed into the market unsafe drugs, knowing that deaths would
result -- all because it aimed to protect the economic interests of the drug companies that sponsored the drugs."
And yet, a company cannot make any claims to the public that curcumin might offer cancer prevention benefits? I checked
on H.R. 4282, and it appears there has been no activity on this bill since November 2005.
I do not want to
go back to the days where snake oil salesmen traveled from town to town duping the vulnerable out of their hard-earned
cash. But this is the 21st century of information-rich, consumer-savvy grown-ups capable of making informed decisions.
In my opinion, we do not need big brother protecting us from ourselves. Your opinion?